« Spelling police! | Main | The Huffington Post »
May 02, 2005
An interesting weekend
Something non-political for a change. At least it's going to start off that way. No promises that I won't inject something political somewhere.
As I mentioned in this post, I'm adopted. I've known that I'm adopted for my entire life. By the way, being adopted is not a shameful thing and we don't need your pity. I only say that because there's always someone that thinks that being adopted deserves a pat on the back and that look that says "they feel your pain". For a mother to give up her baby is an incredibly unselfish act and there's never a question that a couple that adopts a child had an "accident".
Oh and when I refer to my mom and dad those are my adoptive parents (and only real parents). The same goes for my sister Jenny. This can get a bit confusing.
I digress.
I was always curious about my birth parents. I always wanted to know if I looked like them, talked like them, the whole nature vs. nurture thing. I'd thought about looking into what it takes to find out who they were but never did. My birth certificate listed my mom as the woman that gave birth to me and I had no clue where to begin to find my original birth certificate.
Then in 1991, about 9 months after I turned 21, I'm at my college apartment and get a phone call from my parents that they "needed to talk" (usually not a good sign) and were going to drive up to see me. They wouldn't say what it was about over the phone. As it turns out, my birth mother had contacted the adoption agency and asked to make contact with me. Apparently that's legal once the child turns 21, at least in Ohio it is. They called my parents and my parents told me about it. The agency faxed me a form to sign and my birth mother signed a form of her own and faxed it back. Then they swapped our phone numbers.
That's when I met my birth mother, Rebeca.
The basics: I'm 1/2 Venezuelan, never had a clue that I was anything but the palest of the pale caucasians. Although it did explain why I always tanned up so well and seldom burned. I also have two half-sisters, Jeni and Annie. They lived less than 30 minutes from where I grew up for most of my childhood and moved to Boise when I was about 14.
A month or two after we first spoke I flew out to Boise and met her, Jeni, Annie and her husband Bill. Eventually I met her father, brothers and sister and lots of cousins. Apparently I have cousins in Venezuela too. Oh and I have her hair. This incredibly dark thick curly hair.
She also gave me the name of my birth father, Greg (last name withheld). Not to embarrass Rebeca but I was an accident from a youthful indiscretion. He was never told that she was pregnant. The last she had heard, he lived about 20 minutes away from where I was at the time. This was pre-internet so searching for him would've meant libraries, old phone books and knocking on doors. I didn't bother.
So last summer I decided to look him up. Some searching on Google and whitepages.com showed that he still lived at the address listed in the 1982 phone book that Rebeca still has. Same phone number too. But as it turned out, I just missed him. His number was disconnected a month or two earlier and no new number was given. His county's tax assessor records showed that he bought a new house so I shelved my search for a few months and waited for his new phone number to make the online records. I've checked every couple of months since and it never showed up.
So last week when the tax assessor records showed that he still owned the first house, and the new one, and yet another one that he bought from HUD, I realized that he was buying them to fix up and probably sell. So I used whitepages.com to reverse-address his neighbors and got hold of one of them on the phone. The guy was nice enough to leave a note in Greg's mailbox that said "Looking for Greg" with my phone number.
Greg called me on Saturday.
So imagine you're 57 years old and about to find out that you had a son that's now 35 and were never told about him.
The conversation went like this:
Paul: "This is going to sound a bit strange but bear with me. I want to say first off that I'm not looking for anything from you."
Greg: "Ok"
Paul: "Do you remember a woman you dated around February, March, April of 1969 named Rebeca? Little Venezuelan girl."
Greg: "Yea, I remember her."
Paul: "Well... you knocked her up" (figured I'd try to ease the shock with some humor)
Greg: "You're kidding"
Paul: "Nope"
At first he didn't think it was possible and then remember that "one time". Guess that's all it takes.
The basics: The other half is scots-irish. That explains the paleness. He was divorced at the time and has a son that's older than me, and a son and daughter by another wife that are younger than me.
We talked for about 20 minutes and we're going to try to meet the next time I'm in Ohio. He gave me some family history that I jotted down as best I could. I won't keep it all straight anyway. I can't keep my own parents' family trees straight.
My relationship with Rebeca is very comfortable. She's family and I do consider her daughters to be sisters. None of them anywhere near as close as my feelings for my parents and sister though. I have no expectations for anything of the sort with Greg's family. It's just nice to know that the men in his family don't die of heart disease at 60.
Posted by Paul Witt at May 2, 2005 12:24 PM
Comments
Paul,
Wonderful story. Probably laid to rest a lot of questions you have had most of your life. Not trying to pick a fight or politicize this but aren't you glad Rebeca didn't take the same road a lot of young girls do when they have their youthful indiscretions? Congratulations on finding your biological father. Did he happen to say or did you happen to ask if he would have wanted to know this a long time ago? I think I would have if I had been him.
Posted by: Ron at May 2, 2005 01:22 PM
Great stuff Paul.
Good luck with the meeting.
I have raised more than one child as the dad when they weren't biologically mine and I can say that it didn't matter one bit to me. It's about the love and attention and time and shared experiences.
Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: gonzone at May 2, 2005 03:48 PM
Thanks.
Ron,
Having an abortion was never an option for Rebeca regardless of the legality. It wasn't acceptable in her family or her religion. Exactly how anyone should reach that conclusion before or after Roe v. Wade.
Although if she had decided on an abortion I doubt I'd care very much.
Posted by: Paul Witt at May 2, 2005 04:26 PM
Sorry I mentioned it.
Posted by: Ron at May 2, 2005 05:40 PM
Did you tell me one time that you thought abortion was wrong, but that you feel it is between the girl, her doctor and God?
Posted by: Ron at May 5, 2005 08:25 PM
Yes. And I believe that was the view I expressed in my earlier reply.
Nobody is pro-abortion Ron. Nobody raises their daughter with the hope that she'll one day have the chance to have an abortion. \o/
But you can be damn sure that there are a lot of people out there that are glad their daughter had the option. Most of which want government nowhere near the decision making process.
You know, that whole small gov't conservatism thing.
Posted by: Paul Witt at May 6, 2005 02:06 PM
So if I don't want to give welfare to lazy folks who will not work (and no Paul, I am not talking about the truly needy) shouldn't that be between me, my banker and God. If I have committed a sin by not giving exercise facilities to homeless vagrants shouldn't I be punished by God and not the Omnipotent Paul Witt and the Liberal freaks in the democratic party who wish to steal my money and buy votes.
Posted by: Ron at May 6, 2005 02:51 PM
Might as well follow this up. These parents that are so happy the government is staying out of their business are happy that a school administrator can take their child to get an abortion without their knowledge? Is that what you are trying to tell me? You know that whole big gov't liberal "it takes a village of freaks" thing.
Posted by: Ron at May 6, 2005 03:45 PM
I'd like to offer my thanks to you Ron. Only a real asshole Republican could take this post and turn it into right-wing cesspool of hate. Keep preachin brother, the lurkers need to see what a real conservative man is like.
You're mixing social conservatism with fiscal conservatism. Most non-libertarians (small L) don't view issues of fiscal policy as a personal privacy and civil rights issue. And what the hell are you talking about with a school administrator taking someone to get an abortion?
Posted by: Paul Witt at May 6, 2005 04:10 PM
Let's make this simple for you. If you think abortion is wrong, then please, tell me what is wrong with it. And if something is wrong with it, why do you support it? Will they kick you out of the commune? Afraid you won't be able to think for yourself?
Just saying it is wrong but that you support it is too ambiguous. At least tell us what is wrong with it. If it's not a child, why is it wrong? And if it is a child, why are you killing them? Please give more detail here.
Posted by: Ron at May 6, 2005 10:40 PM
Note the language. "Why are you killing them?"
Really, I am? I'm personally performing an abortion? The American Taliban would be so proud.
I digress.
My problem with abortion isn't about when life beings it's with selfishness. A woman that can't be bothered to give up 9 months of her life so that a child can live is, well... I can't think of a polite word to call such a woman.
My faith also leads me to the conclusion that it's wrong and sinful but, unlike some, I don't try to directly legislate my faith.
But the problem is, from a civil liberties perspective and living in a free country as we do, there's no way to prevent abortions. You can't tell when a woman is pregnant. You can't force blood tests when a woman crosses a border. The measures it would take to prevent abortions would be downright totalitarian.
How's that? Is that "on the record" enough for you? Make sure you keep hard copies of all my positions on all the issues so you personally can scuttle my campaign.
This is me quaking in my loafers.
Posted by: Paul Witt at May 7, 2005 08:53 AM
Why do you always answer in such a smart ass way? Do you think they should be promoting it in school? You think it is wrong to export democracy but you have no problems with tax dollars going to planned parenthood around the globe. If it is wrong should we be promoting it around the world? That is no way to make it safe or rare. Luckily, George Bush really doesn't believe in it and he quit funding it. He did not tell them they can or cannot have abortions. He just said the US tax payers were going to quit paying for it and your side went nuts. I have to pay outrageous prices for cigarettes because your side thinks they should sue, sue, sue all the time over health care cost. But you think it should be alright for me to pick up the tab on abortion. Because some poor person is not going to have access. Why not just let you pick up the bill? What is wrong with that? I pick up the cost for cigarette related health care issues and you pick up the cost for the abortion health care issues. I don't have to smoke. They don't have to get abortions. This is all elective. Preventing murders, rapes, car thefts, cocaine sales are all tough to accomplish. We do the best we can at preventing these but it does not make us totalitarian. And the "you running for office" was a joke. The chance of you ever holding any high office is slim and none. You do not have the resources to make a go at it. You saw the loser your side ran against Haslam. She never stood a chance. I laughed right along with everyone else that watched the debate between Mrs. Feelgood who will bring the homeless to the table and Haslam. The reason I mentinoned it was because you sound like a wannabe.
Posted by: Ron at May 7, 2005 10:20 AM
I might run for office someday. I'd love to. But I'd have to better understand the job and have positions on the issues that are substantially different than the current holder of the office. Oh and there is no "low" office in Knox County. The County Commission is in charge of a billion dollar annual budget.
And the funding wasn't cut because they performed abortions, it was cut because they discussed abortion as an option. The government still pays for abortions under this President.
Posted by: Paul Witt at May 7, 2005 05:01 PM
Might I recommend you moving to a smaller town and starting there.
Posted by: Ron at May 7, 2005 11:21 PM